« The "Soaker" Campaign | Main | ARA Lifestyle - Two Click Display Arbitrage »

Comments

teemoney

Jay-

Having used both ad blade and adfusion, I can attest that adfusion is by far the better of the two for quality purposes. What gets me is these types of placements get distribution but direct advertisers dont. While we spoke today about the proliferation of the floggers (and now I know what your definition of that is) I truly believe the blame lies with publishers as this is a way for branded publishers to skirt the internal network debate. The sad thing is that display market has yet to be efficient and until it does become efficient, the next form of flogging will surface.

Matias Leiva

Yeah I noticed that adfusion def. has better conversion/quality of traffic.

Thanks jay for this great insight as well.

Dana Todd

Great article, Jay. And balanced - you are right on about the business behind starting and running an ad network.

It is tempting to just take the low-hanging money when building an ad network, especially if you're arbitraging. But if you ever want to get out of that situation, and move to being a true partner with publishers, you do need to clean up your act. You will also burn out with consumers pretty shortly, too, and it may drive "blindness" to your units over time. One of the reasons we're sticking to our guns and running only high quality sponsored content in our storyboard advertorial units is that we want to build user trust and interest. Yes, the sales cycles are longer but the ultimate outcome is that I'm proud of our content.

Dana Todd, CMO
Newsforce Network

Mirna

is there other ad networks similar to adfusion or adblade?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

My Photo
AddThis Social Bookmark Button